Cases 1 - 10 of 535
Libuser v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2024cv08072
Plaintiff:
David Sutherland Libuser
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Freeman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Autumn Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mike Faust, Abraham Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Covil et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Mitch Chapman
Defendant:
Max H Covil, Arizona, State of, Barb Kiffmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Limon v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Perla Limon
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Theodore Mellas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakanwagi v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02441
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahoney v. Valdez et al
as 3:2023cv08607
Plaintiff:
John Francis Mahoney
Defendant:
Sheena Valdez, Danielle Thorhaug, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Nakanwagi v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2023cv08610
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nathreen Nakanwagi
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
