Cases 81 - 90 of 119
Terrio Williams v. Dexter Payne
as 21-2393
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrio Sanchez Williams
Little v. Arkansas General Assembly et al
as 4:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Mahoney, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Von Holt v. Arkansas General Assembly et al
as 4:2021cv00502
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Mahoney, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Plaintiff:
Frankie Von Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. Arkansas General Assembly et al
as 4:2021cv00503
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Mahoney, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Arkansas General Assembly et al
as 4:2021cv00507
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Mahoney, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 21-2592
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Webb v. Arkansas General Assembly et al
as 4:2021cv00498
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Mahoney, Arkansas General Assembly and others
Plaintiff:
Micah Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard Noble v. Dexter Payne
as 21-2529
Petitioner:
Leonard Noble
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Nicholas Roos v. Dexter Payne
as 21-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas Roos
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director of the Arkansas Division of Correction
Timothy Duffel v. AR Division of Corrections, et al
as 21-2007
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Greene County Courts, Arkansas Division of Community Correction and Arkansas Division of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Duffel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
