Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ramirez #147145 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Ramirez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Banuelos-Encinas, Unknown McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisenall #157093 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00697
Plaintiff:
George Wayne Chisenall
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan and Arlene McKamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00548
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated , Arlene McKamey , Michael Heggman and others
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valenzuela #172770 v. McKamey et al
as 2:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey, Eliza Homer, Mike Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela # 172770 v. McKamey et al
as 2:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey and Eliza Homer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooney #37364 v. McKamey
as 2:2014cv02398
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Edward Cooney
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk #068675 v. McKamey et al
as 2:2014cv01710
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Monk
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey, Corizon Medical Services, Matt Mussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper # 273764 v. Corizon Health Company et al
as 2:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Warren Michael Skipper
Defendant:
Corizon Health Company and Arlene McKamey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeRoche #147875 v. Corizon Health et al
as 2:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Joshua DeRoche
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Unknown Party, Arlene McKamey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chesley #076964 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv02267
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Chesley
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Arlene McKamey, Mickh Finch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
