Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Armstrong v. Florida Memorial University, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60634
Plaintiff:
Mikyla Armstrong
Defendant:
Florida Memorial University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Florida Memorial University, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60635
Plaintiff:
Mikyla Armstrong
Defendant:
Florida Memorial University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Polo v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2023cv21684
Plaintiff:
Frank Polo, SR and Frank Polo, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott Marcus Bernstein, Marcia Del Rey, Spencer Multack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv10046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
WILLIAMS et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
RODNEY WILLIAMS, JR, TANIYAH WILLIAMS, DAVID ROGERS and others
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, SHEVAUN HARRIS, JOSEPH LADAPO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TUCKER v HOROWITZ et al
as 1:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID TUCKER
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, KATHRYN WILBURN DREY, MARIE ARMSTRONG MOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv00124
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, KATHRYN WILBURN-DREY, DELRAHIM MAKAN and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2019cv23793
Defendant:
Jane Doe, JOHN DOE and Corey Armstrong
Plaintiff:
James Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENSON v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2019cv00071
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY, JOSHUA ARMSTRONG and MICHAEL COPELAND
Plaintiff:
TORRANCE HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
