Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Boersma v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv01782
Plaintiff:
Heather Lynn Boersma
Defendant:
Sean Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Barker, et al.
as 6:2020cv01885
Defendant:
Logan Bilyeu, Joseph Bartness, Joshua Barker and others
Plaintiff:
Maureen A. Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farris v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2019cv02013
Plaintiff:
Joshua Farris
Defendant:
North Wasco School District and Cindy Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mason v. Armstrong
as 6:2017cv00845
Defendant:
Carl Armstrong
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Vrooman et al v. Armstrong
as 3:2016cv01109
Unknown:
Katherine D. Armstrong
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J. Garrett, Henry Lyle Mayhew, Charles Bruce Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vrooman et al v. Armstrong
as 3:2016cv00770
Defendant:
Katherine D. Armstrong
Plaintiff:
Henry Lyle Mayhew and Ronald Charles Vrooman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00439
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith v. Haselton et al
as 1:2012cv02224
Defendant:
Judge Rex Armstrong, Paul DeMuniz, Judge Rick Haselton and others
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacLaughlan et al v. Haselton et al
as 2:2012cv02222
Defendant:
Justice Rex Armstrong, Justice Thomas A. Balmer, Chief Justice Paul DeMuniz and others
Plaintiff:
Harold MacLaughlan and Rebeca MacLaughlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
