Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Khalil Rashad Armstrong
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Williams
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Larry Leabough, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Armstrong
as 7:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Deputy B. A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Leabough, et al
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Lacy Ferguson
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, Armstrong, Major Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Beasley v. T. Peyton, et al.
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
T. Peyton, Larry Leabough, Mark Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Smith v. Lebough et al
as 1:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Dayomic Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Larry Lebough, Lt. Charles Armstrong, Sheila Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Melby v. Morgan et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dajade Elijah Melby
Defendant:
Sheriff Gabe Morgan, Sr., Sgt. T. Walker, Sgt. G. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coward v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Donnell Coward and Kelvin D. Coward
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, D. Dameron, S. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
