Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jesus Arreola-Ochoa v. Monty Wilkinson
as 21-1179
Petitioner:
JESUS M. ARREOLA-OCHOA
Respondent:
MONTY WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Arreola et al v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, International Union et al
as 1:2020cv05600
Plaintiff:
Armando Arreola and Danny Arreola
Defendant:
Sam Cicinelli, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, International Union and Local Lodge 701 of theInternational Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Arreola v. Alro Steel Corporation
as 1:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Cesar Arreola
Defendant:
Alro Steel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
ARREOLA-CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2017cv03437
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA CASTILLO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Arreola-Ortega et al v. M&J Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05927
Plaintiff:
Cesar Arreola-Ortega , Salvador Cantero and Noe Roman
Defendant:
M&J Asphalt Paving Company, Inc. and James V Distasio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jesus Arreola-Castillo v. USA
as 17-1439
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS ARREOLA-CASTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arreola-Avila, Miguel v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00358
Petitioner:
Miguel Arreola-Avila
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jesus Arreola-Castillo v. USA
as 16-1452
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA-CASTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ARREOLA-CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv02118
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA-CASTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jesus Arreola-Castillo v. USA
as 14-2383
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS ARREOLA-CASTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
