Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Baur v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04544
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Baur
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC and The Northland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hernandez v. Forster & Garbus, LLP et al
as 1:2010cv04018
Plaintiff:
Annalise Hernandez
Defendant:
Forster & Garbus, LLP and Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hawkins v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tesa Hawkins
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hawkins v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 8:2010cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tesa Hawkins
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marcus Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 10-12077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. MIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Sanchez v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 0:2010cv60655
Plaintiff:
Maria A. Sanchez
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COONS v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00638
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and Robben, Blauert, Rahlfs & Rohrback
Plaintiff:
KAREN COONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pokorny v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00339
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC and Johnson Mark, LLC
Plaintiff:
Amanda Pokorny
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Balstad et al v. Arrow Financial Services LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00503
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services LLC and Robben, Blauert, Rahlfs & Rohrback
Plaintiff:
Gary Balstad and Pamela Balstad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnny Gonzales v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 10-55379
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHNNY GONZALES, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
