Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Arthur Robinson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1622
Defendant / Appellant: ARTHUR L. ROBINSON
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arthur Robinson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-31053
Respondent / Appellee: DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, DIXON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTHUR RAY ROBINSON
In re: Arthur Robinson
as 18-30949
Movant: In re: ARTHUR R. ROBINSON
USA v. Arthur Robinson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2295
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ARTHUR L. ROBINSON
ROBINSON v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00507
Plaintiff: ARTHUR RAY ROBINSON
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
IMO 2013 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2013mc00060
Respondent: Anne M Schueler-Hickey, Tanya Renee Bell, Christina Johnston Cloutier and others
In Re: Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Education Requrements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, and/or Failure to Submit IOLTA Certification re Indiana Supreme Court Order of May 30, 2013
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent: JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
In re: Arthur Robinson
as 12-31186
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR R. ROBINSON
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent: PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Arthur Lee Robinson v. Crane Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84269
Defendant: Crane Co
Plaintiff: Arthur Lee Robinson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?