Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rubenstein v. Purebase Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark Rubenstein
Defendant:
Arthur Scott Dockter
Nominal Defendant:
Purebase Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-1052
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Hellmuth v. Leanne Hood, et al
as 19-3198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. HELLMUTH
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNN BUSCH-HAYMAN, Butler Co. Magistrate - Individual and Official Capacity, LEANNE HOOD, JAMES C. SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2917
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nominal Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Prelle et al v. Prelle et al
as 1:2015mc00149
Petitioner:
Arthur Scott Prelle
Defendant:
Arthur S Prelle and Carol A Prelle
Cause Of Action: Miscellaneous Application
Arthur West v. Stephen Johnson, et al
as 09-36066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN L. JOHNSON, U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATOR, US SECRETARY OF COMMERCE and others
WILLIAMSON et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 1:2003cv01456
Plaintiff:
AFEWERKI ABEBE, ODEY AGI, MALCOLM BELFROM, JR. and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS-DISTRICT LODGE 141-M and UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Claimant:
MICHAEL M OLSON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
John Doe #1, et al v. Arthur West
as 09-35832
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant:
SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
