Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Wood v. Taylor et al
as 1:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
Dean Arthur Wood
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael Taylor and Nurse Lisa Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansa Mussa v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 12-3635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mansa Kan Kan Mussa
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Debra Reed, Arthur Woods and others
Joseph Dayringer, et al v. David Webster, et al
as 12-2434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Leroy Dayringer and James Eric Mansfield
Defendant - Appellee:
David Webster, Arthur Wood, Bill Galloway and others
Timothy Green v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 11-2251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Wood, Bill Galloway and others
Daniel Skipper v. J.C. Correctional Center, et al
as 10-2086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant - Appellee:
Jefferson City Correctional Center, David Dormire, J. Cassady and others
Timothy Straeten v. Potosi Correctional Center, et al
as 10-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Straeten, Timothy Straeten, Timothy Straeten and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Potosi Correctional Center, Jefferson City Correctional Center, Larry Crawford and others
James Scott, Sr. v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James M. Scott, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Woods, Larry Crawford and others
Daniel Skipper v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 09-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Arthur Woods and others
Straeten v. Potosi Correctional Center et al
as 2:2009cv04018
Plaintiff:
Timothy Straeten
Defendant:
Potosi Correctional Center, Jefferson City Correctional Center, Larry Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Skipper v. Jefferson City Correctional Center et al
as 2:2009cv04004
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Skipper
Defendant:
Jefferson City Correctional Center, David Dormire, J Cassady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
