Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Artis v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
Shantasia Artis
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Artis v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02069
Plaintiff:
Khadijah Artis, Z. and Khadijah Z. Artis
Defendant:
NextGen Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
SUMRALL v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00187
Defendant:
WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON, DEPUTY WARDEN TONYA ASHLEY and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
AMMON RA SUMRALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLERBEE v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
WILBERT ELLERBEE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILCOX STATE PRISON and WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERILEIN v. SINGLETON
as 1:2020cv05044
Petitioner:
JEAN JOCELY MERILEIN
Respondent:
Artis Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MERILEIN v. SINGLETON
as 5:2020cv00432
Respondent:
WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON
Petitioner:
JEAN JOCELY MERILEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIDLEY v. SINGLETON
as 5:2020cv00390
Respondent:
WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON
Petitioner:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIDLEY v. SINGLETON
as 1:2020cv00193
Respondent:
WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON
Petitioner:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
