Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wooten v. Ascend/Alkem Laboratories
as 1:2022cv03401
Plaintiff:
Aisha Wooten
Defendant:
Ascend/Alkem Laboratories and Ascend Laboratories LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. et al v. Deva Holdings A.S.
as 1:2020cv11063
Plaintiff:
Alkem Laboratories Ltd. and Ascend Laboratories, LLC
Defendant:
Deva Holdings A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10087
Defendant:
Allergan Sales, LLC, Hetero USA Inc., Allergan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.,, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Walgreen Co. et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09793
Plaintiff:
H-E-B, L.P., Walgreen Co., Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Hetero USA Inc., Allergan, Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Hetero USA Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv08756
Defendant:
Hetero USA Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ascend Laboratories, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. a/k/a Kinney Drugs, Inc., KPH Healthcare Services, Inc. and Kinney Drugs, Inc.
Interested Party:
J M Smith Corporation d/b/a Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
J M Smith Corporation v. Watson Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07110
Defendant:
Hetero USA Inc., Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation and J M Smith Corporation on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
County of Suffolk v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04009
Defendant:
Bausch Health Americas, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pliva, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Suffolk and Wockhardt USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
