Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ash v. Law Enforcement Agencies et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02860
Plaintiff: Davenell L Ash
Defendant: Law Enforcement Agencies and Duluth, MN Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00891
Plaintiff: Davenell L Ash
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Force, 12 Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff: James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00295
Plaintiff: Davenell L Ash
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Dept, Hibbing Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv02479
Plaintiff: Davenell H Ash and Davenell L Ash
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Duluth Police Dept, Hibbing Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. Lee et al
as 0:2022cv01804
Plaintiff: Davenell H Ash
Defendant: Rich Lee, Troy Loeb, Lee Ann Garbano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01528
Plaintiff: Kevin Ash
Defendant: 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Ash v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv01143
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Lee Ann Gargano, Hibbing Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Davenell L Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff: James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Eidem et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00937
Plaintiff: Kenneth Herrington, Eric Lundquist, Bernard Lee and others
Defendant: Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?