Cases 11 - 20 of 415
Rose v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2024cv03033
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Nancy Ashcraft, Jamie Kirkhan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Ashcraft, Kristy Fonoimoana, N. Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Michael Crenshaw
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Holzer, . Edger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bird v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Keith Paul Bird
Defendant:
Julie Williams, Rayford, Lopes and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashcraft v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Susan Estella Ashcraft
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03359
Plaintiff:
Larry Cox
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Ashcraft
as 3:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
Davon Ruffin
Defendant:
. Ashcraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2023cv03343
Plaintiff:
Marcus Craig
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Brittany Greene, Cathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Ashcraft et al
as 3:2023cv03801
Plaintiff:
Sean Rose
Defendant:
Nancy Ashcraft, Jamie Kirkhan, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHCRAFT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01885
Petitioner:
CAMILLE ASHCRAFT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
