Cases 1 - 10 of 283
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BEAGLES v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
JOHNNY DALTON BEAGLES
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LORUSSO v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Respondent:
FLORIDA SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, ASHLEY MOODY and CENTURION MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
LEONARDO T MORALES
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, LANCE NEFF and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hafner v. DeSantis et al
as 8:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Ashley Moody and Cord Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taveras et al v. The State of Florida et al
as 6:2023cv02397
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Taveras and Valeria R Taveras
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Ashley Moody, Honorable Christine Arendas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LORUSSO v. DESANTIS et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY and CENTURION MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Moody
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Raymond Owen, Jr.
Respondent:
Ashley Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HAFNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ASHLEY MOODY and RON DESANTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
