Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Young, Frank et al v. Marshfield Clinic Health System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Frank Young, Hazen Michelle, Dakota Young and others
Defendant:
Marshfield Clinic Health System, Inc., Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund, Aspirus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe, John v. Aspirus, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Aspirus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Team Schierl Companies et al v. Aspirus, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
Team Schierl Companies and Heartland Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
Aspirus, Inc. and Aspirus Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Traczyk v. Aspirus, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00077
Defendant:
The Board of Directors of Aspirus, Inc., Unknown Parties, Aspirus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Traczyk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
