Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Atherholt v. PA Public Utility Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Samantha L. Atherholt
Defendant:
PA Public Utility Commission and The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holloman v. Hudson et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Holloman
Defendant:
Commissioner Monroe Hudson, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Warden Robert May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fagan v. Conmy et al
as 3:2021cv02043
Plaintiff:
Medina Fagan
Defendant:
James Conmy, Brian Atherholt, John Doe Wilkes-Barre City Police Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddux v. Atherholt et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Lt. Justin Atherholt, Warden Robert May, Staff Lt. Orlando DeJesus and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Maddux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynard v. Hollingsworth et al
as 1:2020cv00838
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Norman Diggs, Correction Officer Jacob Payton, Deputy Warden Natasha Hollingsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Sabir Lynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coates JR. v. Faulkner et al
as 1:2020cv00772
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Coates JR.
Defendant:
Robert Heishman, Robert May, Lt. Justin Atherholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Atherholt et al
as 1:2020cv00210
Defendant:
Sgt. McKenna, Cpl. Faulkner, Cpl. Dicampli and others
Plaintiff:
Anel Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Desmond v. Klopp et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Justin Atherholt, John Doe, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. Evans et al
as 1:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
Kamilla Denise London
Defendant:
Commissioner Perry Phelps, Shane Troxler, Lt. Justin Atherholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
