Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Atkins v. City of Reading et al
as 5:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
Damon Atkins
Defendant:
Mayor Eddie Moran, Chief of Police Richard Tornielli, Sergeant Bradley T McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CANNON v. ATKIN OLSHIN SCHADE ARCHITECTS, INC.
as 2:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
BILL CANNON
Defendant:
ATKIN OLSHIN SCHADE ARCHITECTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
ATKINS v. HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU et al
as 1:2020cv01844
Plaintiff:
Kevin Atkins
Defendant:
Harrisburg Police Bureau, John Doe I, Nathaniel Pucciarello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS v. HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU et al
as 2:2020cv04297
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ATKINS
Defendant:
HARRISBURG POLICE BUREAU, OFFICER ERIK HENRY, OFFICER DUANE PYLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS v. GEORGE W HILL PRISON
as 2:2020cv02712
Defendant:
GEORGE W HILL PRISON
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ATKINS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATKINS et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05631
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
ADA ATKINS and ROBERT ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atkins v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01622
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Atkins
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ATKINS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03361
Plaintiff:
DORIS ATKINS and THOMAS PALUS
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
