Cases
The Satanic Temple v. Labrador, et al.
as 24-1243
Plaintiff: THE SATANIC TEMPLE
Defendant: RAUL LABRADOR, in his capacity as the Attorney General of Idaho, JAN M BENNETTS, in her capacity as Ada County Prosecutor and STATE OF IDAHO
Lance Wood v. Paul Panther, et al
as 23-35407
Plaintiff / Appellant: LANCE CONWAY WOOD and RENEE WOOD
Defendant / Appellee: PAUL R. PANTHER, Deputy Attorney General, MARK KUBINSKI, Deputy Attorney General, BRENT REINKE, IDOC, Director of Prisons and others
Calvillo v. Attorney General of Idaho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00293
Petitioner: Valentin Calvillo
Respondent: Attorney General of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lance Wood, et al v. Paul Panther, et al
as 20-35757
Defendant / Appellee: KARA NIELSON, ISCI Investigator, JARED WATSON, Ada County Sheriff's Department (ACSD) Detective, PAUL PANTHER, Deputy Attorney General and others
Plaintiff: RENEE WOOD and RODNEY SCHILLING
Plaintiff / Appellant: LANCE CONWAY WOOD
ALDF, et al v. Lawrence Wasden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-35960
Plaintiff - Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF IDAHO and others
Defendant - Appellant: LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Idaho
Amicus Curiae: PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION, IDAHO BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, FOOD LAW & POLICY SCHOLARS and others
Kuehl v. Attorney General of Idaho
as 1:2008cv00196
Petitioner: Darryl Robin Kuehl
Respondent: Attorney General of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Urrizaga v. Attorney General for Idaho
as 1:2007cv00434
Petitioner: Richard J Urrizaga
Respondent: Attorney General for Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?