Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Resurrection School, et al v. Robert Gordon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2256
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL A. SIEMON, in her official capacity as the Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney, LINDA VAIL, in her official capacity as the Health Officer of Ingham County, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHANIE SMITH, individially and as next friend on behalf of her minor child F.S. next friend of F.S., CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, individually and as next friend on behalf of his minor chilidren C.M., Z.M., and N.M. next friend of C.M. next friend of Z.M. next friend of N.M., RESURRECTION SCHOOL and others
Libertas Classical Assn v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-2085
Defendant / Appellee: MARCIA MANSARAY, individually and in her official capacity as Deputy Health Administrator of the Ottawa County Department of Health
Plaintiff / Appellant: LIBERTAS CLASSICAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant: DANA NESSEL, individually and in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan, ROBERT GORDON, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, individually and in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Dana Nessel v. Go to Gifts, Inc.
as 2:2020cv12713
Defendant: Go to Gifts, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dana Nessel, Attorney General for the State of Michigan and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Dana Nessel v. Vintner's Collective, LLC
as 2:2020cv12715
Defendant: Vintner's Collective, LLC
Plaintiff: Dana Nessel, Attorney General for the State of Michigan and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Baker Events, LLC, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-1711
Defendant / Appellee: GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor for the State of Michigan, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan and LISA STEFANOVSKY, in her official capacity as Health Officer, Ottawa County Department of Public Health
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAY CARLL and BAKER EVENTS, LLC
Midwest Institute of Health, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1650
Plaintiff / Appellee: JEFFERY GULICK, WELLSTON MEDICAL CENTER, PLLC, PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES, PC and others
Defendant: ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellant: DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Midwest Institute of Health, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1611
Plaintiff / Appellee: JEFFERY GULICK, PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES, PC, WELLSTON MEDICAL CENTER, PLLC and others
Defendant: DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Dana Nessel v. Amerigas Partners, L.P., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1098
Defendant / Appellant: AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P.
Plaintiff / Appellee: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, ex rel., The People of the State of Michigan
In re: Amerigas Partners, L.P., et al
as 19-113
Petitioner: In re: AMERIGAS PARTNERS, L.P. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P.
Respondent: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, ex rel., The People of the State of Michigan
Smith v. Attorney General for the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2019cv12491
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections, Attorney General for the State of Michigan and Michigan State Police
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?