Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Noble v. United States OF America et al
as 5:2013hc02012
Petitioner: Frederick Allen Noble
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKOY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2012hc02279
Petitioner: Billy Ray McKoy
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00072
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Fletcher v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2011hc02065
Petitioner: Louis Lavelle Fletcher
Respondent: United States Parole Commission and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Romney v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 5:2010hc02214
Petitioner: Makonnen Romney
Respondent: Attorney General of the United States, Harrell Watts, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 5:2010hc02119
Plaintiff: David E. Simpson
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General of the United States and Gerald Branker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burston v. McGinley et al
as 5:2010hc02027
Petitioner: Curtis Burston, Jr.
Respondent: John C. McGinley and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOORE v. ZIEGLER et al
as 1:2010cv00118
Petitioner: MELVIN MOORE, JR.
Respondent: JOEL ZIEGLER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?