Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gaddis v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00524
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States of America and Joe Biden
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Secretary of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv00270
Respondent:
Scott Hassell, Attorney General of the United States, Jonathon Horton and others
Petitioner:
Gurnam Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv00923
Petitioner:
Joe Nathan Reid
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pittman v. Rathman et al
as 1:2012cv00046
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman, Sr
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Galaviz v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv01730
Petitioner:
Juan M Galaviz
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burke v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv01437
Petitioner:
Stephen G Burke
Respondent:
John T Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinson v. Rathman et al
as 1:2011cv00329
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singletary v. Ratham et al
as 2:2010cv03396
Petitioner:
Albert Bruce Singletary
Respondent:
John Ratham and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wiggins v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv02519
Petitioner:
Chavon Wiggins
Respondent:
John T. Rathman and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pegues v. Warden et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Terrell Pegues
Defendant:
Warden, Federal Prison, Attorney General of the United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
