Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Government of the Province of, et al v. Estevan Lopez, et al
as 17-5241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Government of the Province of Manitoba
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Missouri, ex rel Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Estevan Lopez, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Michael J. Ryan, Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, David Rosenkrance, Dakotas Area Manager, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
State of North Dakota
Sun et al v. State of New York Office of the Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv05916
Defendant:
109 Precinct and 2 Female Enforcement Police Officers from 109 Precinct, Alfonse D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Attorney Generals Office of Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Pharisee:
Akwei Oko Acquaye, Aprilanne Agostino, Thomas P. Aliotta and others
Wang Xing Ren:
Aron M. Bloom, Daniele Dezago, Sean P. Greene and others
Wand Xing Ren:
Robert L. Capers
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jian Sun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wescott v. Zenk
as 17-1833
Petitioner:
RICHARD R. WESCOTT
Respondent:
MICHAEL A. ZENK, Warden, NH State Prison
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Govt of the Province Manitoba, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5203
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba and State of Missouri, ex rel Chris Koster, Missouri Attorney General's Office
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, John W. Keys, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, MaryAnne C. Bach, Great Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
State of North Dakota
BestRateDirect.com, Inc. et al v. Moxley et al
as 6:2016cv00539
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Shortes
Defendant:
John Moxley, Jr. , Brevard County State Attorney's Office , Brevard County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northwest School of Safety, et al v. Bob Ferguson, et al
as 15-35452
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND FOR I594, CHERYL STUMBO and WASHINGTON ALLIANCE FOR GUN RESPONSIBILITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHWEST SCHOOL OF SAFETY, a Washington sole proprietorship, DARRYL LEE, GOTTLIEB FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, a Washington trust and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BOB FERGUSON, Attorney General of Washington (in his official capacity), WASHINGTON ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, DOES I-V and others
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Glenn Henderson v. Town of Hope Mill
as 14-2044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF HOPE MILLS, OTIS WRIGHT, JAMES ROSEN and others
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
HALL v. U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv01082
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL HALL
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
