Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Livell Figgs v. Alex Dawson, et al
as 15-2926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIVELL FIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX DAWSON, Warden, in his personal capacity, AUSTIN RANDOLPH, Warden, in his personal capacity, LORI FISHEL, in her personal capacity and others
Donelson v. Watson et al
as 3:2012cv03086
Plaintiff:
Charles Donelson
Defendant:
Jimmy Watson, . Hamilton, . Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Randolph et al
as 1:2011cv01241
Plaintiff:
Bartlett Sims
Defendant:
Austin Randolph, . Lercher, . Obassie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Obaisi et al
as 3:2010cv03314
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Norwood
Defendant:
Saleh Obaisi, Lisa Learcher, Alex Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Walker et al
as 3:2010cv03175
Plaintiff:
Carlton Ferguson
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr, Jackie Miller, Sarah . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollinshead v. Randolph
as 3:2010cv03136
Petitioner:
Ryan C Hollinshead
Respondent:
Austin Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Samuels v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 10-1899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SAMUELS
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOGAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, AUSTIN RANDOLPH, Warden and others
Beshears v. Randolph
as 2:2010cv02072
Petitioner:
Vantice L Beshears, Jr
Respondent:
Austin Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Williams v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 09-3962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE, Director, LOGAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Judy v. Wexford Health Care et al
as 2:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Judy
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Lisa Lercher, Dee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
