Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jarvis v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Yvette Jarvis
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc. and AutoZoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rochelle v. Autozoners, LLC
as 23-7847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROCHELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
AUTOZONERS, LLC, DBA Autozone, ALLDATA LLC, DBA Alldata Automotive Intelligence, AUTOZONE, INC. and others
Defendant:
GEORGE VERKAMP and SATWINDER MANGAT
Andino v. Autozoners, LLC
as 1:2023cv06410
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Andino
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Camara v. Tait et al
as 1:2023cv02464
Plaintiff:
Teejan M Camara
Defendant:
Jeremy Patrick Tait and Autozone Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Duran v. Autozoners, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07817
Plaintiff:
Jofeny Duran
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC, Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jonas v. AutoZoners LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03672
Plaintiff:
Corry Jonas
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC, AutoZone, Stores, Inc. and AutoZone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00911
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
