Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Avera McKennan v. Meadowvale Dairy Empl Benefit, et al
as 19-2163
Defendant / Appellant:
Meadowvale Diary, LLC, in its Capacity as Plan Administrator and Meadowvale Dairy Employee Benefit Plan
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Avera McKennan
Avera McKennan v. Meadowvale Dairy Employee Benefit Plan et al
as 5:2018cv04010
Plaintiff:
Avera McKennan
Defendant:
Meadowvale Dairy Employee Benefit Plan and Meadowvale Dairy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL AND UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2014cv01481
Plaintiff:
AVERA MCKENNAN HOSPITAL AND UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER , AVERA QUEEN OF PEACE HOSPITAL , WHEATON FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SUTTER HEALTH et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2014cv00850
Plaintiff:
SUTTER HEALTH , PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER , CHEYENNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv02065
Plaintiff:
DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY , LAWRENCE AND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SAINT ROSE HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv01004
Plaintiff:
SAINT ROSE HOSPITAL , MERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED , CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
MCG MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
MCG MEDICAL CENTER , UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL , SAINT CLOUD HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Harrison Medical Center et al v. Sebelius
as 2:2011cv01175
Plaintiff:
Harrison Medical Center , Multicare Health System , Public Hospital District No. 2 Snohomish County and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
