Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Shepherd v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2015cv01923
Plaintiff: Cory Shepherd
Defendant: James LeBlanc, Nathan Cain and Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. LeBlanc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01923
Plaintiff: Cory Shepherd
Defendant: James LeBlanc, Nathan Cain and Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffrey Thurman v. Nathan Cain, II, Warden
as 15-30519
Petitioner - Appellant: JEFFREY KEITH THURMAN
Respondent - Appellee: NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Noble v. Avoyelles Correctional Center
as 2:2015cv01978
Plaintiff: Clarence D. Noble
Defendant: Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Horton v. Jindal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv01707
Plaintiff: Calvin Horton
Defendant: Bobby Jindal, James LeBlanc, Gibbs Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Young v. Nathan Cain, II, Warden, et al
as 15-30364
Petitioner - Appellant: EARL BLAKE YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee: NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER and RICHARD J. WARD
Duplessis v. Avoyelles Correctional Center
as 1:2015cv01212
Plaintiff: Ragille Harry Duplessis
Defendant: Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duplessis v. Avoyelles Correctional Center
as 2:2015cv00871
Plaintiff: Ragille Harry Duplessis
Defendant: Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenrard Broussard v. Nathan Cain
as 15-30224
Petitioner - Appellant: KENRARD D. BROUSSARD
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER, also known as Nathan Cain
Noble v. Avoyelles Correctional Center
as 5:2015cv00510
Plaintiff: Clarence D Noble
Defendant: Warden Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?