Cases 1 - 10 of 57
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02698
Plaintiff:
ROBERT B JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
JAY B JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, 3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Murzike v. Putney et al
as 3:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Putney, Holly, Nolles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
D. Allen, A. Woren, M.G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 9:2023cv80484
Plaintiff:
Kennis D. Johnson
Defendant:
Dennis B. Johnson, Patricia Lewis, Celeste Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parson v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Davion Parson
Defendant:
B. Reed, W. Wiggins, N. Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04514
Plaintiff:
VINCENT B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03868
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holte v. Department of Revenue et al
as 8:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Department of Revenue, Charles Denton, Stephen Mathew Whyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
