Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blackmon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Petitioner:
Nathanael Blackmon and Nathaniel Blackmon
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Thomas
Defendant:
B. M. Antonelli, United States of America, Christy Matthew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ingram v. Phyail et al
as 5:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Terry Lavell Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Phyail, F. Perry, J. Idlerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Trappier v. B. Antonelli
as 22-6445
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY GENE TRAPPIER, a/k/a Anthony G. Trappier
Respondent:
WARDEN B. M. ANTONELLI
Harris v. Antonelli
as 5:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Robert Marvin Harris
Respondent:
B. M. Antonelli and Warden, FCC Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lee-Thomas v. Antonelli
as 3:2021cv00187
Petitioner:
Gary Justin Lee-Thomas
Respondent:
B. M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCoy v. USP Coleman I et al
as 5:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant:
USP Coleman I, B. M. Antonelli, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Antonelli
as 1:2020cv00240
Respondent:
B. M. Antonelli, AUSA Timothy A. Bass and AUSA Roder A. Henton [sic]
Petitioner:
Seville Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. Antonelli
as 5:2020cv00211
Petitioner:
Alfred D. Wright
Respondent:
B. M. Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
