Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wright v. Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center et al
as 4:2015cv01346
Plaintiff:
Alfred Domenick Wright
Defendant:
Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions, Director Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Rochester v. Wilson et al
as 6:2013cv02197
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
A Wilson, H B Richardson, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Richardson et al
as 6:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
H B Richardson, Robert Ward, 18076 Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Richardson et al
as 6:2012cv03198
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
H B Richardson, South Carolina Department of Corrections, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Richardson et al
as 6:2012cv03150
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
H B Richardson, D Truesdale, 159 Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03100
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
