Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
SMITH v. SMITH
as 1:2020cv11052
Petitioner:
GEORGE B. SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv10040
Plaintiff:
GEORGE B. SMITH
Defendant:
RICHARD T. SMITH and CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09997
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EL BEY v. SHERIDAN et al
as 1:2018cv14976
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JEFFERSON EL BEY
Defendant:
KEVIN P. MCGOVERN, JUDGE LOIS H. GOODMAN, JUDGE PETER G. SHERIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURASHKO v. HAMMER et al
as 3:2017cv02533
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MURASHKO
Defendant:
N. ROBERT HAMMER , ALAN G. BUNTE , BRIAN CAROLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFRED v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE E. ALFRED
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ATLANTIC CITY MUNCIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TEDESCHI et al v. SMITH et al
as 3:2009cv03134
Plaintiff:
RALPH E TEDESCHI and ELEANOR TEDESCHI
Defendant:
MAXWELL B SMITH, III, HOLLY H. SMITH, DEBORAH EVARTS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
