Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Martinez v. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv02068
Petitioner:
Joshua Michael Martinez
Respondent:
B Birkholz and J Monarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marquis Collins v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv08084
Petitioner:
Marquis Collins
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jose Antonio Vilano Alvarado v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv08052
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Vilano Alvarado
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Leonel L. Nordhausen Cuevas v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv07287
Petitioner:
Leonel L. Nordhausen Cuevas
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jaime Montalvo Ruiz v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv06792
Petitioner:
Jaime Montalvo Ruiz
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Craig Schults v. B. Birkholz, et al
as 23-55281
Petitioner / Appellant:
CRAIG SCHULTS
Respondent / Appellee:
B. BIRKHOLZ, FCC Complex Warden and C. PETERS, FBOP Director
James M. Murray v. Warden B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv02139
Petitioner:
James M. Murray
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dywane Tousant v. B. Birkholz
as 23-55254
Petitioner / Appellant:
DYWANE TOUSANT
Respondent / Appellee:
B. BIRKHOLZ
Jose Lizarraras-Chacon v. Warden B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01865
Petitioner:
Jose Lizarraras-Chacon
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jose Antonio Gomez-Cuzme v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv01753
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Gomez-Cuzme
Respondent:
Warden B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
