Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Iran Ketchup v. B. Birkholz
as 22-55673
Petitioner / Appellant:
IRAN DEWAYNE KETCHUP
Respondent / Appellee:
B. BIRKHOLZ
Damian James v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv03897
Petitioner:
Damian James
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Manuel Delgado v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv03548
Petitioner:
Manuel Delgado
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robert Gene Rand v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv02146
Petitioner:
Robert Rand
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Andrew Moore, Jr. v. B. Birkholz
as 22-55244
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW MOORE, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
B. BIRKHOLZ
Andrew Moore v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv00594
Petitioner:
Andrew Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dywane Tousant v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv00386
Petitioner:
Dywane Tousant
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robert Bernard Ernst v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv00354
Petitioner:
Robert Bernard Ernst
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Iran Dewayne Ketchup v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2021cv09936
Petitioner:
Iran Dewayne Ketchup
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dwight Jorgensen, et al v. B. Birkholz, et al
as 21-3168
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dwight Chris Jorgensen, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Paxton Anderson, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent / Appellee:
B. Birkholz, Warden of Federal Prison Camp Duluth, in their official capacities and Michael D. Carvajal, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in their official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
