Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Cook v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00509
Petitioner: Wade B Cook
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Damon Cook v. Darrel Adam
as 09-70294
Petitioner: DAMON B. COOK
Respondent: DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Boles et al v. Engle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00438
Plaintiff: Gladys Boles, Gladys Boles, Herk Bolton and others
Defendant: Mary Siobhan Engle, Clyde Engle, Clyde Engle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Defendant
Lita B. Cooke et al v. The Boeing Company et al
as 2:2008cv05141
Plaintiff: Lita B. Cooke and Jennifer C. Sullivan
Defendant: The Boeing Company, L-3 Communications Corporation, L-3 Communications Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Damon Cook v. Darrel Adam
as 08-56231
Petitioner - Appellant: DAMON B. COOK
Respondent - Appellee: DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Damon Cook v. Darrell Adam
as 08-55920
Petitioner - Appellant: DAMON B. COOK
Respondent - Appellee: DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Damon B. Cook v. Darrel G. Adams
as 5:2008cv00745
Petitioner: Damon B Cook
Respondent: Darrel G Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon Cook v. Darrel Adam
as 08-55807
Petitioner - Appellant: DAMON B. COOK
Respondent - Appellee: DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Damon B Cook v. Darrel G Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00570
Petitioner: Damon B Cook
Respondent: Darrel G Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon Cook v. Darrel Adams
as 08-55666
Petitioner - Appellant: DAMON B. COOK
Respondent - Appellee: DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?