Cases 1 - 10 of 94
(PS) Bliss v. Quality Loan Service Corp.,et al
as 2:2023cv02614
Plaintiff:
Kay Bliss
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Kevin McCarthy, Rochelle Matkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Decker Jordan v. David LeMasters
as 23-6021
Petitioner / Appellant:
DECKER B. JORDAN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID LEMASTERS
Jordan v. DOJ - Office of the United States Attorney
as 23-3862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Jordan v. Federal Court Security Officers
as 23-3873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL COURT SECURITY OFFICERS
Jordan v. County of Los Angeles
as 23-3759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Children and Family Services
Jordan v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 23-3767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WATSON, Deputy at Stanley Mosk Court, official capacity, PLATT, Detective, Los Angeles Police Department and others
James B. Jordan v. Federal Court Security Officers
as 2:2023cv08183
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Court Security Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bliss v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al
as 2:2023at01149
Plaintiff:
Kay Bliss
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Kevin McCarthy, Rochelle Matkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In The Matter of James B. Jordan
as 2:2023mc00154
In Re:
In The Matter of James B. Jordan
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
James B. Jordan v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
as 2:2023cv07121
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
