Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36993
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN B MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18113
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE B MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15329
Plaintiff:
LARRY B MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howarth v. Quinn-Henry et al
as 6:2011cv00621
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Howarth
Defendant:
Loretta Quinn-Henry, Vince B. Montgomery, James O'Hern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howarth v. O'Hern et al
as 6:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Howarth
Defendant:
James O'Hern, Vince B. Montgomery, Loretta Quinn-Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howarth v. Montgomery et al
as 6:2011cv00544
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Howarth
Defendant:
Vince B. Montgomery, Teresa A. Sprague, Lovetta Quinn-Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howarth v. Quinn-Henry, et al
as 6:2011cv00550
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Howarth
Defendant:
Karen L. Livengood, Lovetta Quinn-Henry, Valerie Demings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howarth v. Quinn-Henry et al
as 6:2011cv00549
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Howarth
Defendant:
Lovetta Quinn-Henry, Valerie Demings, Buddy Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VADEN v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
DONNA VADEN and DONNA VADEN
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL and MICHAEL B MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 6:2007cv01417
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
