Cases 1 - 10 of 56
D. v. Abbott
as 24-40248
Plaintiff:
M. D., by next friend Sarah R. Stukenberg, D. I., by next friend Nancy G. Pofahl, Z. H., by next friend Carla B. Morrison and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, Cecile Erwin Young, in her official capacity as Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission of the State of Texas and Stephanie Muth, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Scott v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Philips v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Agarwal v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05680
Plaintiff:
Avantika Agarwal
Defendant:
Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Welsh v. Veritiv Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08554
Plaintiff:
Kevin Welsh
Defendant:
Veritiv Corporation, Stephen E. MacAdam, Salvatore A. Abbate and others
Williams v. Veritiv Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Veritiv Corporation, Stephen E. Macadam, Salvatore E. Abbate and others
Wang v. Veritiv Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08284
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Veritiv Corporation, Stephen E. MacAdam, Salvatore A. Abbate and others
O'Dell v. Veritiv Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08212
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Veritiv Corporation, Stephen E. MacAdam, Salvatore A. Abbate and others
Cheng v. Merritt et al
as 4:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Abby Cheng
Defendant:
Douglas S. Merritt, Jason E Child, Sara J. Baack and others
Flannery v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Flannery
Defendant:
Graham V. Smith, Stephen G. Newberry, Patricia B. Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
