Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Florence v. Benrostrol et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
M. Martin, A. Silva, J. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
David Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Outman v. Paramo et al
as 3:2018cv02101
Respondent:
B. Olivarria, B. Vogel, S. Bahro and others
Petitioner:
Robert H. Outman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Outman v. Paramo et al
as 2:2018cv02339
Plaintiff:
Robert Outman and Robert H. Outman
Defendant:
B. Self, S. Sanchez, C. York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Paramo et al
as 3:2018cv02002
Plaintiff:
Zuri Sanakabis Young and Zuri Sana-Kabisa Young
Defendant:
J. Salinas, B. Self, P. Bragamonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rademaker v. Juarez et al
as 3:2018cv01831
Defendant:
A. Hernandez, R. Walker, B. Self and others
Plaintiff:
David Rademaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Castaneda v. CDCR et al
as 3:2018cv01018
Plaintiff:
Jesus Barilla Castaneda
Defendant:
CDCR, Daniel Paromo, P. Brocamonte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodlow, Jr. v. Camacho et al
as 3:2018cv00709
Plaintiff:
Ivan Frances Goodlow, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Camacho, Mr. Sagalas, Mr. Salas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Schwartzmiller v. K. Rodriguez, et al
as 18-55433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RODRIGUEZ, Psychologist at the Richard J. Donovan State Prison (RJD), JOHN LARSON, NBC News Correspondent, NBC NEWS and others
David Wilson v. P. Shabira, et al
as 18-55260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
P. SHABIRA, HODGES, L. GONZALES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
