Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Young, et al v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 1:2007wf17116
Defendant:
Deloro Stellite Company, Inc., Fibre-Metal Products Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Angelita B. Young and Randolph H.C. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maemori et al v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Defendant:
Viacom Inc., Polarit Welding, Inc., TDY Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kim, Felipa C. Menor, Gail Toshiko Yamasaki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
YOUNG et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63882
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR B YOUNG and CONSTANCE YOUNG
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ACANDS INC, RILEY STOKER CORPORATION, FLEXITALLIC INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE COPR ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Young et al v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Young and Mary B Young
Defendant:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Young et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2007cv00258
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Young and Jocelyn Young
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Amchem Products, Inc., American Optical Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodyear Canada, Inc. and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cross Defendant:
Anchor Packing Company, BMCE Inc., Burnham, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG et al v. OWENS-ILLINOIS et al
as 2:2007cv61330
Plaintiff:
LEROY J. YOUNG and RUTH B. YOUNG
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, OWENS-ILLINOIS, OWENS-ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
