Cases 1 - 10 of 4,190
Dutschmann v. 84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership et al
as 3:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Dutschmann
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, a limited partnership, Ace Hardware Corporation, Advance Stores Company Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Oswald et al v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2023cv01074
Defendant:
Domco Products Texas, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Cross Defendant:
Redco Corp, Judith Oswald, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodrich Corporation, H.M. Royal, Inc. and IMO Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Oswald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
HOWARD v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
MARTIN M. HOWARD
Cross Claimant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CORNING, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, CRANE COMPANY, EATON CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, GTE OPERATIONS SUPPORT, INC., THE OKONITE COMPANY and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MIGHTY AUTO PARTS and MIGHTY AUTO PARTS WESTERN NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DIMAGGIO v. AGCO COPORATION et al
as 3:2023cv03054
Defendant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., BELL TEXTRON INC., DCO LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
MORSE TEC LLC, CUMMINS, INC., FEDERAL-MOGUL ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
ROCCO DIMAGGIO
Cross Claimant:
DAP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Candice Martin v. Goodrich Corporation, et al
as 23-2343
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CANDICE MARTIN, individually, and as Executrix of the Estate of Rodney Martin, deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
GOODRICH CORPORATION, formerly known as B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY and POLYONE CORPORATION, individually and as Successor-By-Consolidation to the GEON COMPANY, now known as AVIENT CORPORATION
Goodrich Corporation, et al v. Candice Martin
as 23-8015
Petitioner:
GOODRICH CORPORATION, formerly known as B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY and POLYONE CORPORATION, Individually and as Successor-By-Consolidation to the GEON COMPANY, now known as AVIENT CORPORATION
Respondent:
CANDICE MARTIN, individually, and as Executor of the Estate of Rodney Martin, deceased
DIMAGGIO v. AGCO COPORATION F/K/A AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC et al
as 2:2023cv03054
Defendant:
BELL TEXTRON INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC, AGCO COPORATION F/K/A AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (AHM); and others
Plaintiff:
ROCCO DIMAGGIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WHERRY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03376
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, PEP BOYS and others
Cross Claimant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, PEERLESS PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL ANN JAKUBAC-WHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Heilner, Jr. et al v. Advanced Thermal Hydronics, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00616
Cross Defendant:
Advanced Thermal Hydronics, LLC, Burham, LLC, Industrical Holdings Corporation and others
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc., CBS Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, Dyntherm Boiler Manufacturing and others
Plaintiff:
Earl K. Heilner, Jr. and Kathryn Heilner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martin v. Polyone Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01323
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation, Polyone Corporation and B.F. Goodrich Company
Plaintiff:
Candice Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
