Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Black v. Corvajal et al
as 1:2022cv04870
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
B.O.P. Director Michael Corvajal, Unknown Directors, Unknown USP Atlanta Wardens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dept. of Trans., USP Atlanta Sanitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammonds v. Andrews, Warden et al
as 5:2021cv00459
Petitioner:
Carlton L. Hammonds
Respondent:
Kathrine Laybourn, Erika Young, FNU Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Black v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv02958
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Black
Defendant:
United States of America and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2020cv00103
Respondent:
Warden Trevonze Bobbit, GDC Commissioner, U.S. Marshals and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Black v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv03538
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Attorney General William Barr, USDC Judge Baverman and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Black v. Agents of the B.O.P. et al
as 1:2020cv01399
Defendant:
Counselor Cornejo, Lt. Fayat, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. B.O.P. et al
as 5:2019cv00510
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Kathy P. Lane, Leonor Bonnet-Engebreston, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. B.O.P. et al
as 6:2019cv01848
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Kathy P. Lane, Leonor Bonnet-Engebreston, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Director of B.O.P.
as 1:2017cv23456
Defendant:
Director of B.O.P.
Plaintiff:
Avinie Maurice Bates, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
