Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Elrod v. B.O.P.
as 5:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Kevin Earl Elrod
Defendant:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lopez v. Heckard
as 5:2022cv00313
Petitioner:
Brandon Lopez
Respondent:
B.O.P. and Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prigmore v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
William Prigmore
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
Katina Heckard and Mulitple Unknown Agents of B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tillman v. Huffman et al
as 1:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Tillman
Defendant:
Warden C. Maruka, Unit Manager B. Huffman, Regional Director D. J. Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Ms. Stopher, Mrs. Yeager and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Due and Brent Swallers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boshears v. Coakley et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy D. Boshears
Defendant:
Joe Coakley, K. Craddock, J. Landon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Berryman v. Mullen et al
as 1:2016cv00047
Defendant:
Mullen, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Berryman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDonald v. Warden et al
as 3:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Timothy McDonald
Defendant:
FCI Gilmer Warden, Harley Lapin, B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Razzoli v. Middle District Court Clerk (MD. Pa.) et al
as 2:2008cv00057
Petitioner:
Kevin Razzoli
Respondent:
Middle District Court Clerk (MD. Pa.), Warden FCI Gilmer (Nominal), G W Bush and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzalez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv00104
Petitioner:
Michael Gonzalez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kumma Deboo, Records Office for B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
