Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Bacon v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv50430
Plaintiff:
Shelley Bacon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Braden v. Benton et al
as 3:2023cv03588
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Benton, David Bartoni, Anthony Skobel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacon v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11392
Plaintiff:
Marcy Bacon
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bacon v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10697
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bacon
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rojas v. Collective Solar, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Collective Solar, LLC and Prospect Bacon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Wakefield v. Franklin County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff Dept., David Bartoni and Kyle Bacon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv03718
Plaintiff:
Douglas Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Thomas Dart, Antwaun Bacon and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stephens v. Bacon
as 1:2020cv05168
Plaintiff:
BEULAH STEPHENS
Defendant:
Christopher Bacon
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
