Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baker et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01666
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS DOWDUPONT, INC., EIDP, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, CORTEVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE BAKER, BRYAN BARKLEY, MICHAEL BURRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Robert A. Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Rogene Earl Holden
BAKER v. CORMACK et al
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
NEAMIA B. BAKER
Defendant:
KAREN TATE CORMACK and CLAUDE CEDRICK CORMACK
Askew's Day Care, Inc. et al v. City of Kinston, et al
as 4:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Gordon Wade, Dr. Joseph Askew, Curtis Washington and others
Defendant:
City of Kinston, Jason Baker, Jackie Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharp v. Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Linda R. Sharp
Defendant:
Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina , Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc. , D. Ken Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina et al
as 2:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Linda R. Sharp
Defendant:
Town of Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, Griggs & Co. Homes, Inc., D. Ken Griggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Case Opened in Error
as 7:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
2433 South Boulevard, LLC, LORRAINE ANGEL, Michael Austin and others
Receiver:
William K. Angel
Petitioner:
Julie Hunter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
