Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Outlaw Unlimited, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv04711
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Outlaw Unlimited, LLC d/b/a Johnny B's Outlaw Saloon and Johnny Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Madise v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv03777
Plaintiff:
Tron Madise
Defendant:
Harris County, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Charles Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jaycox v. TDCJ ID Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Floyd Junior Jaycox
Defendant:
TDCJ ID Agency, Bryan Collier, John Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. City of Victoria et al
as 6:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moreno
Defendant:
City of Victoria, City of Victoria Police Department, Council for City of Victoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ballard v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ballard v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Garrett James Ballard
Respondent:
Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madrid v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jose Madrid
Defendant:
FNU Jenkins and Sgt. FNU Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
