Cases 1 - 5 of 5
McCue v. City of Bangor Maine, et al
as 15-2460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCUE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Phillip McCue, Deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
BANGOR, ME, OFFICER KIM DONNELL, Individually and in her official capacity as an officer of the Bangor Police Department, OFFICER WADE BETTERS, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the Bangor Police Department and others
Defendant:
BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. and OFFICER RYAN JONES, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the Bangor Police Department
McCue v. City of Bangor Maine, et al
as 15-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCUE, Individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Phillip McCue, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, OFFICER WADE BETTERS, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the Bangor Police Department, OFFICER CHRIS BLANCHARD, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the Bangor Police Department and others
Defendant:
BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT, TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. and OFFICER RYAN JONES, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the Bangor Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 10-2015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MANUEL
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, PARK WOODS and others
Defendant:
US ARMY, Bangor Recruiting Station, BANK OF AMERICA and GILBERT AND GRIEF LAW FIRM
Manuel v. City of Bangor, et al
as 10-1821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY MANUEL
Plaintiff:
EUNICE MANUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
BANGOR, ME, BANGOR GENERAL ASSISTANCE, PARK WOODS and others
Defendant:
PENQUIS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, BANGOR AREA HOMELESS SHELTER, B & L PROPERTIES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
