Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
NORRIS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, S. JULIAN, BARACK OBAMA and others
Petitioner:
JOHN NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CALLEN v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2017cv00037
Petitioner:
JOHN CALLEN, JR.
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, S. JULIAN, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TURNER v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Defendant:
Mr. BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Plaintiff:
JAMES TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Restricted Filer v. Roberts et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Roberts, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY v. DANIELS
as 2:2015cv00154
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS and BARACK OBAMA
Petitioner:
ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUDD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF INDIANA, BARACK OBAMA and SECRETARY OF STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KEITH JUDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. OBAMA
as 1:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00916
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA, JENNIFER A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arias v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gutierrez Arias
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
