Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pricaspian Development Corp, et al v. William Martucci, et al
as 17-3743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORP, JACK J. GRYNBERG and GRYNBERG PETROLEUM CO
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM C. MARTUCCI, YAMEL GONZALEZ, BARBARA QUEEN, A/K/A BARBARA CARR-QUEEN and others
Pricaspian Development Corp, et al v. William Martucci, et al
as 17-2225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORP, JACK J. GRYNBERG and GRYNBERG PETROLEUM CO
Defendant - Appellee:
YAMIL GONZALEZ, RICHARD SCHAEFER, ANTHONY STERBENS and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
WILLIAM C. MARTUCCI, BARBARA QUEEN, a/k/a Barbara Carr-Queen, I/T/F John Carr and JOSEPH SCHAEFER
QUEEN v. CEDARBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
as 2:2014cv06393
Plaintiff:
BARBARA QUEEN
Defendant:
CEDARBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , JACK GRYNBERG and GRYNBERG PETROLEUM COMPANY
Defendant:
GERARDO GONZALEZ, TERESA CORCORAN-SCHAEFER , DEVYN SCHAEFER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al v. MARTUCCI et al
as 2:2011cv01459
Plaintiff:
PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , JACK GRYNBERG and GRYNBERG PETROLEUM COMPANY
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. MARTUCCI, YAMIL GONZALEZ, BARBARA QUEEN and others
Counter_claimant:
GARY MARTUCCI, BARBARA QUEEN, YAMIL GONZALEZ and others
Counter_defendant:
GRYNBERG PETROLEUM COMPANY , JACK GRYNBERG and PRICASPIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Fairbanks et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al
as 3:2007cv00806
Plaintiff:
Charles Fairbanks, Charles Fairbanks, Charles Fairbanks and others
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Phillip Morris U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
