Cases 41 - 50 of 251
United States of America v. Blondet (Dones-Gonzalez)
as 21-1817
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Blondet, AKA Cabezon, William Robles, Julio Marquez-Alejandro, AKA Chino Montero and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Dones-Gonzalez, AKA Jason, AKA Arrabal
Barber v. New York City Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv04706
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Leonard Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdsall v. PRA Health Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04467
Defendant:
Colin Shannon, Alexander G. Dickinson, Matthew P. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Birdsall
Barber v. New York City et al
as 1:2021cv04293
Defendant:
New York City and Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Leonard Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trovato v. PRA Health Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03324
Defendant:
Colin Shannon, Alexander G. Dickinson, Matthew P. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Trovato
Tambe v. PRA Health Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03189
Defendant:
Colin Shannon, Alexander G. Dickinson, Linda S. Grais, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Himanshu Tambe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Ciccotelli v. PRA Health Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02981
Defendant:
Indigo Merger Sub, Inc., Colin Shannon, Alexander G. Dickinson and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Wang v. PRA Health Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02814
Defendant:
Colin Shannon, Alexander G. Dickinson, Linda S. Grais, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Barber v. United States of America et. al.
as 2:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Nova Barber
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, John and Jane Does 1-10, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
